Zinia T Nujum*, Sabarinadh MG, Athira Mohan, Praveen PS
Department of Community Medicine, Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram
*Corresponding author – Zinia T Nujum, Associate Professor, Community Medicine, Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram
email email@example.com, phone -9037356908
An estimated 3.4 billion people are at risk of malaria. The use of drugs for prevention of malaria among people at risk of the disease has been practiced since centuries in the form of chemoprophylaxis, intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) or Mass Drug Administration (MDA). Articles were retrieved using search from Cochrane database of Systematic reviews and Google search. Keywords used included “malaria chemoprophylaxis”,” Drugs for prevention of Malaria” and “guidelines for prevention of Malaria”. Chemoprophylaxis is an effective strategy for a limited time but it does not offer lifelong protection. The 6 drugs in the WHO guidelines for chemoprophylaxis of Malaria are Atovaquine Proguanil combination, Chloroquine, Chloroquine- Proguanil combination, Doxycycline, Mefloquine and Proguanil. The guidelines for India recommend Doxycycline for short stay and Mefloquine for longer stay. Regimens recommended for use in South Africa include Mefloquine, Doxycycline or Atovaquone – proguanil. MDA has gone into disrepute because of its ability to produce drug resistance, however examples of successful elimination using MDA exists. IPT give to women in first and second pregnancies reduced the number of women with severe anaemia, perinatal deaths and increased the birth weight of babies. WHO recommended IPT for children consist of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine and Amodiaquine given to children between 3-59 months. Reviews of IPT in children show benefits in reducing the number of malaria episodes and preventing severe disease and deaths. IPT in infants show 30% reduction in incidence. The use of drug to prevent malaria in those with sickle cell anaemia show favourable effects in reducing gthe number of sickle cell crises, blood transfusions, hospital admissions and increasing mean haemoglobin . More research is required in prevention of malaria for bringing less costly drugs with limited side effects. Priority should be given to the use of non pharmacological measures to reduce the burden of disease, so that we can prevent the need for using drugs for prevention of malaria.
An estimated 3.4 billion people are at risk of malaria. Of this total, 2.2 billion were at low risk (1 case per 1000 population) live mostly in the African Region (47%) and the South-East Asia Region (37%). Due to increased global investment and action on malaria control substantial progress has been made since 2000. A number of factors determine the risk of acquiring malaria infection. These include the intensity of transmission in the area, the length of stay in the area, the time of year (in areas of seasonal malaria transmission), the inclusion of an overnight stay (as transmission occurs between dusk and dawn), the prevalence of drug resistant malaria in the area, the susceptibility of the host (High risk groups include non-immunes, pregnant and breast-feeding women, young children, comorbid disease, splenectomised and immunocompromised patients, the presence of comorbid disease and concurrent medications, the type of accommodation (e.g. air conditioned rooms, camping), access to medical care . The risk of malaria transmission varies greatly according to the specific destinations within a defined geographic area. While the risk of malaria is much less at altitudes above 1500 metres, disease can occur in hot climates at altitudes of up to 3000 metres.[2, 3]
The use of drugs for prevention of malaria among people at risk of the disease has been practiced since centuries. The empiric use of antimalarial drugs to prevent malaria can be generally grouped into three categories: 1) chemoprophylaxis, where drugs are administered at suppressive doses throughout the defined period; 2) intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), where a full curative dose of an antimalarial is given to a target population at specified times; or 3)MDA, where drugs are administered to the whole population either using full therapeutic courses, known as direct MDA, or through the fortification of dietary salt, known as indirect MDA (the Pinotti method).[4,5] A large number of good reviews exist on the prevention of malaria using drugs. This narrative review tries to summarise them
Initial search was done in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. The keywords used for search were “malaria chemoprophylaxis”. Five results were obtained. Out of them, one was not in English and hence excluded. Another article was on vaccines in pregnant women for tetanus, which described the need for studying the interaction of these vaccines with chemoprophylaxis of malaria. This was also excluded. There were three major results. First the abstracts were gone through, then the full texts and then retrieved articles from “more like this” section. Google search was also done using the search term “Drugs for prevention of Malaria” and “guidelines for prevention of malaria”.
If an individual is travelling to a malaria area, it is important to determine whether he or she requires chemoprophylaxis, or whether adequate protection can be provided by the regular use of personal protection measures. The decision as to whether chemoprophylaxis is necessary is complex. It depends on the areas to be visited and the risk that the traveller has of being exposed to mosquitoes and of developing malaria. The greater the traveller’s risk of contracting malaria and developing complications, the greater the need for chemoprophylaxis. People at highest risk of developing severe malaria complications include the elderly, babies and young children (< 5 years), pregnant women and immunocompromised individuals (e.g. patients living with HIV and AIDS, those who have had a splenectomy, and patients receiving long-term steroids or chemotherapy).
Chemoprophylaxis is an effective strategy for a limited time (ranging from a few weeks to a few years). However, it does not offer lifelong protection because of the high costs and the potential for development of drug resistance.
Malaria infects 10,000 to 30,000 international travellers each year. A cochrane review was done to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of atovaquone-proguanil, doxycycline, and mefloquine compared to each other, and also when compared to chloroquine-proguanil and to primaquine. Eight trials with 4240 participants were obtained. Overall the evidence base was small, and there was no evidence to support the use of primaquine. There was only limited evidence on which of the three currently available drugs is most effective in preventing malaria. While none of the eight trials reported any serious adverse events, all trials reported common adverse events from antimalaria drugs. Atovaquone-proguanil and doxycycline were well tolerated by most travellers, and they are less likely than mefloquine to cause neuropsychiatric adverse events. Chloroquine-proguanil caused more gastrointestinal adverse events than other chemoprophylaxis. In other respects, the common unwanted effects of currently available drugs are similar. Another 22 published case reports of deaths, including five suicides, associated with mefloquine use at normal dosages. No other currently used drugs were reported as causing death, at normal dosages.
WHO guidelines for chemoprophylaxis 
According to the guidelines for India Chemoprophylaxis should be administered only in selective groups in high P.falciparum endemic areas. Use of personal protection measures is encouraged for pregnant women and other vulnerable population including travellers. However, for longer stay of Military and Para-military forces in high Pf endemic areas, the practice of chemoprophylaxis is to be followed wherever appropriate. For Short term chemoprophylaxis (up to 6 weeks) Doxycycline, is the drug of choice. Chemoprophylaxis for longer stay (more than 6 weeks) is with Mefloquine.
Regimens currently recommended for use in South Africa (2009), include Mefloquine, Doxycycline or Atovaquone – proguanil.
Guidelines from the Health Protection Agency Advisory Committee on Malaria Prevention (ACMP) in UK travellers (2007) recommend Mefloquine, or Doxycycline or Atovaquone/Proguanil for travel to high risk areas of Bangladesh and India. Chloroquine plus proguanil is recommended as an alternative. For travel to areas where the risk is variable, the latter is recommended and the former options are kept as alternative. Only awareness of risk and protection from mosquito bites is recommended for travel to low risk areas.
CDC recommends the use of drug according to the country of travel as per the yellow book. They provide reasons for recommending use and nonuse of drugs.
Mass Drug Administration
The administration of drugs against malaria to whole populations, termed mass drug administration (MDA), was a component of many malaria elimination programmes in the 1950s. MDA can be given on more than one occasion. The objective of MDA is to reduce the burden of clinical malaria. A Cochrane review assessed the impact of MDA on several malaria-specific outcome measures. Thirty-two studies were included in this review, from sites in Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. It found that although MDA can reduce the initial risk of malaria-specific outcomes, these reductions are not sustained. However, a few studies showed sustained impact more than six months after MDA. Adverse events were inadequately addressed in most studies. Notable severe drug reactions, including haemolysis, haemoglobinuria, severe anaemia and death, were reported with 8-aminoquinoline plus schizonticide drug co-administration, while severe skin reactions were reported with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine plus artesunate plus primaquine . MDA has been into disrepute for its ability to produce drug resistance . A large study conducted in Nigeria showed that several rounds of MDA combined with intensive vector control did not interrupt transmission. However examples of using MDA for successful elimination of malaria exist in islands of Aiyetun and Cambodia.[13, 14] Elimination of P. vivax is considered to be more challenging than P. falciparum and newer drugs may be required.
Malaria chemoprophylaxis for pregnant women
Women living in malarial areas and who are pregnant for the first or second time are more likely to become infected with malaria. This brings severe anaemia causing weakness and tiredness for the mother, and slows the growth of the baby. A Cochrane review identified seven trials which gave malaria prophylaxis to all pregnant women. The objective of the review was to assess drugs given to prevent malaria infection and its consequences in pregnant women living in malarial areas. This included prophylaxis and intermittent preventive treatment (IPT). Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) is the administration of a full course of antimalarial treatment to a population at risk of malaria during a specific time period, regardless of whether or not they are known to be infected. These did not show any benefit to either the mother or the babies. However another review of 6 trials which gave antimalaria chemoprophylaxis to women in their first and second pregnancies found beneficial effects in terms of reducing the number of women with severe anaemia, increasing the birth weight of the baby and reducing perinatal deaths. The effect of the drug administration to the development of resistance was not assessed.
IPT policies were first implemented in pregnant women (IPTp), as an alternative to chloroquine. The treatment consisted of a single dose of sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) given two or three times during the pregnancy. IPT was introduced because of the unpopularity of chloroquine chemoprophylaxis and drug resistance. IPT with SP is recommended by WHO for all pregnant women resident in areas with a moderate or high level of malaria transmission.
Malaria chemoprophylaxis for children
In areas where malaria is common, young children have repeated episodes of malarial illness, which can sometimes be severe and life-threatening. In areas where malaria is seasonal, a practical policy option is to give drugs to prevent malaria at regular intervals during the transmission season, regardless of whether the child has malaria symptoms or not. This is known as Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPTc).
A cochrane review identified seven trials (12,589 participants); all were conducted in West Africa, and six of seven trials were restricted to children aged less than 5 years. The results show IPTc prevents three quarters of all malaria episodes, including severe episodes, and probably prevents some deaths. Several antimalarial drugs or combinations have been tried, and shown to be effective. The most studied is amodiaquine plus sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AQ+SP). This combination probably doesn’t have serious side effects but does cause vomiting in some children.
Among children, Infants are an important target for prevention using drugs. The WHO also recommends intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) up to the age of 12 months. It should be administered together with the second and third diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) and measles vaccination in areas that have a moderate to high transmission rate of malaria.[20, 21] Vaccination provides a good opportunity for easy delivery of this service. 30% reduction in the incidence of clinical malaria with a variable impact on the incidence of anaemia and hospital admissions has been reported with IPTi. No impact on mortality was detected.
Currently, the WHO recommends seasonal malarial chemoprevention (SMC) or IPTc, in seasonal malarial areas during the transmission season. This consists of a complete treatment course of SP and amodiaquine (AQ), given to children between 3-59 months, at monthly intervals, during the high risk period of malaria transmission. Children may receive up to four doses of this antimalaria treatment during the malaria transmission season with the aim of maintaining therapeutic drug levels during the period of high transmission. This strategy excludes areas with SP resistance outbreak.
Sickle cell anaemia – Malaria infections in people with sickle cell anaemia trigger the development of sickle cell crisis. So it is important to prevent malaria in them. A review conducted by the Cochrane, to look into the effectiveness and adverse effects yielded 2 small trials in 223 persons. It showed that benefit in terms of reducing the number of sickle cell crises, blood transfusions, hospital admissions, and increasing the mean haemoglobin levels, but they did not collect data on potential adverse effects. More research is needed, therefore, to be sure of the benefits and to assess possible problems of drug resistance, and other potential long-term adverse effects that may be associated with continuous treatment.
Quality of studies and articles were not assessed systematically for inclusion and exclusion.
Drugs are not as effective as vaccines a method of prevention of malaria because it has to be taken for long periods of time. Stringent non-drug measures should be taken to avoid mosquito bites throughout the year, even in areas of low malaria transmission intensity. In addition, effective drugs should be taken whenever and wherever the risks of acquiring malaria exceed the probability of experiencing a serious adverse reaction to the drug regime. More research is required in prevention of malaria for bringing less costly drugs with limited side effects. We also need to look at ways in which we can reduce the burden of the disease to such an extent that the use of drugs for prevention of malaria may no longer be required.
WHO. WHO Global Malaria Programme. World Malaria report 2013. Available at www.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/97008/1/9789241564694_eng.pdf. Accessed on 30/06/2014
Turner L, Smith E, Wood D, Harris V. Malaria Update. 2nd Edn. Medicines Information Centre UCT Cape Town. 1994;9.
WHO International Travel and Health 2009. Geneva.
Greenwood B. The use of anti-malarial drugs to prevent malaria in the population of malaria-endemic areas. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2004;70 (1):1–7.
Von Seidlein L, Greenwood BM. Mass administration of antimalaria drugs. Trends in Parasitology. 2003;19(10):452–60.
Malaria prevention and treatment. The prescriber. UNICEF. January 2000. No: 18. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/prescriber/eng_p18.pdf. Accessed on 23-06-2014
Jacquerioz FA, Croft AM. Drugs for preventing malaria in travellers. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006491. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006491.pub2.
National Drug Policy on Malaria. 2013. Directorate of NVBDCP. Available from: http://nvbdcp.gov.in/Doc/National-Drug-Policy-2013.pdf. Accessed on 23/06/2014.
Guidelines for prevention of Malaria in South Africa. Available from http://www0.sun.ac.za/ruralhealth/ukwandahome/rudasaresources2009/ DOH/3%20-%20prevention%20malaria.pdf. Accessed on 30/06/2014.
Claire A Swales, Peter L, Chiodini, Barbara A Bannister. New guidelines on malaria prevention: A summary. Journal of Infection. 2007;54:107-110. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2006.12.004
Poirot E, Skarbinski J, Sinclair D, Kachur SP, Slutsker L, Hwang J. Mass drug administration for malaria. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD008846. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008846.pub2.
Payne D. Did medicated salt hasten the spread of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Parasitol Today. 1988;4:112-115.
Kaneko A, Taleo G, Kalkoa M, Yamar S, Kobayakawa T, Bjorkman A. Malaria eradication on islands. Lancet. 2000; 356:1560-1564.
Song J, Socheat D, Tan B, Dara P, Deng C, Sokunthea S, et al. Rapid and effective malaria control in Cambodia through mass administration of artemisinin-piperaquine. Malar J. 2010;9:57.
Garner P, Gulmezoglu AM. Drugs for preventing malaria in pregnant women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000169. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000169.pub2.
Greenwood B. Review: Intermittent preventive treatment – a new approach to the prevention of malaria in children in areas with seasonal malaria transmission. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2006;11(7):983–91.
Greenwood B. Anti-malarial drugs and the prevention of malaria in the population of malaria endemic areas. Malaria Journal. 2010;9(Suppl 3):S2.
World health Organization: A strategic framework for malaria prevention and control during pregnancy in the African region. Brazzaville Congo, World Health Regional Office for Africa. 2004.
Meremikwu MM, Donegan S, Sinclair D, Esu E, Oringanje C. Intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in children living in areas with seasonal transmission. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003756. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003756.pub4.
WHO. WHO policy recommendation on intermittent preventive treatment during infancy with sulphadoxinepyrimethamine (SP-IPTi) for Plasmodium falciparum malaria control in Africa. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/news/WHO_policy_recommendation_IPTi_ 032010.pdf 2010:1–3.
WHO. World Malaria Report 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2012/report/ en/index.html 2012:1–195.
Aponte JJ, Schellenberg D, Egan E, Breckenridge A, Carneiro I, Critchely J, et al. Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria in African infants: a pooled analysis of six randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 2009; 374:1533-1542.
WHO. WHO policy recommendation: seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) for Plasmodium falciparum,malaria control in highly seasonal transmission areas of the Sahel sub-region in Africa. Available from: http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/smc_policy_recommendation_ en_032012.pdf 2012:1–4
WHO. Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine in children: A field guide. 2013.
Oniyangi O, Omari AA. Malaria chemoprophylaxis in sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003489. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003489.pub2.